Amanda (Smtv image) |
There is this tendency of public figures that approaches
different media houses to ‘tell their different side of the story’ which they
claim is the truth.
These days there are two versions of the truth that do
more harm than intended. It lives people more confused as to what is really
happening.
It has become part of celebville’s culture for artist
even the upcoming ones to run to newspapers and reputable magazines to pour
their hearts out. The things said is usually petty stuff that could have been
easily settled out of public viewing.
I guess most believe no publicity is bad publicity as
long as the masses are talking about them. No one cares about having a pure
brand and attract followers by being their true-selves. Seeming they rather
slide their own names into mud to gain popularity.
I think it is public knowledge that they usually source
their own stories. I mean how possible can it be that a ‘friend’ who insists on being anonymous sells their
buddy to the press and coincidentally be the one knowing the nitty-gritty stuff
that should be known only by the celeb in question?
Relevancy is the daily struggle of talentless celebrity
wannabies. Their stage names are all
over gossip columns and blogs.
What they fail to do is owning up to the stuff said about them
but choose to leave their supporters in the dark. The “don’t believe everything
you read is not enough” because these are the same mediums they use to promote
themselves. Their supporters shouldn’t be expected to only take publications
seriously only when they report the good and ignore the rest when it’s not good
for their brand.
Telling anyone that cares to listen on how so and so
deceived them and how record companies are milking them dry and them being
better than their competition or old flames is so DA-ish. It puts them in a bad
light. It comes across as someone that doesn’t trust their talent and drums up
unnecessary noise to draw attention to them.
Months ago tabloids were having a field day with Amanda
du Point’s allegations on Bona
magazine. Apparently she was sexually harassed
by her then partner who is a famous rapper. Mongers put two and two together
and JubJub’s name came out. They based their assumption on details that Amanda
provided. Amanda had to do a follow up interview and assure everyone that
JubJub is not the rapper that raped her.
Amanda with Jub |
When I read the story my heart went out to her but
wondered why hasn’t she filed a case of sexual harassment and put the loser
behind bars where they belong. Telling the readers what unfortunately
transpired wasn’t gonna get the supposed abuser punished. The whole thing just created a buzz around
her and the suspected abuser whose name is unknown by the public.
It then occurred to me that maybe that’s how she wants to
deal with it and not traumatize herself again by opening a court case. Where
she will be expected to give a detailed account of what happened and relieve
every moment of her deal.
But the growing number of people in the public eye who
would do anything, I mean anything to stay relevant it becomes difficult to decipher
the truth. We find ourselves questioning their motives of suddenly ‘bearing
their souls’ and making known their truths before releasing or launching a new
thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment